Scorecard inputs live across ERP exports, quality logs, emails, and buyer spreadsheets.
Supplier QBRs without spreadsheet theatre
Turn supplier data into a scorecard people can defend.
Create consistent delivery, quality, responsiveness, and cost exception reports from exports you already have—complete with evidence and metric caveats.
No card or migration Fixed-scope pilot Human-confirmed decisions
Venthry SupplierPilot view
Current focusA reusable, evidence-linked supplier scorecard and QBREvidence first · human confirmed
01
A customer-confirmed metric dictionary and weighting sheetReady for review
Priority
02
Supplier-by-supplier exception narratives linked to source rowsOwner assigned
Tracked
03
A QBR-ready pack that preserves missing-data and dispute flagsEvidence linked
Tracked
Read-only pilotUpdated just now
Why this exists
Built around the work competitors leave behind.
Procurement and supply-chain teams that review suppliers monthly or quarterly.
Metric definitions change between reviews, making supplier comparisons hard to defend.
Enterprise suites are configurable, but smaller teams inherit implementation and administration work.
The focused promise
A reusable, evidence-linked supplier scorecard and QBR brief with disputed and incomplete metrics called out.
We deliberately keep judgment, authorization, and consequential decisions with your team. The pilot automates the legwork that can be made observable and repeatable.
- A customer-confirmed metric dictionary and weighting sheet
- Supplier-by-supplier exception narratives linked to source rows
- A QBR-ready pack that preserves missing-data and dispute flags
Venthry SupplierPilot view
Current focusA reusable, evidence-linked supplier scorecard and QBREvidence first · human confirmed
01
A customer-confirmed metric dictionary and weighting sheetReady for review
Priority
02
Supplier-by-supplier exception narratives linked to source rowsOwner assigned
Tracked
03
A QBR-ready pack that preserves missing-data and dispute flagsEvidence linked
Tracked
Read-only pilotUpdated just now
Fast path to evidence
Useful before it becomes software.
One bounded workflow. Real output. A clear go/no-go decision.
- 1Step 1
Choose four to six metrics that already exist in your source exports.
- 2Step 2
Run one sanitized reporting period through the scorecard template.
- 3Step 3
Reuse the mapping next period to prove the workflow is repeatable.
Hard boundary: No supplier sanctions, autonomous sourcing decisions, ERP writes, performance guarantees, or unsupported benchmark claims.
Competitor-review intelligence
Recurring friction became product requirements.
We reviewed dated public operator discussions, preserved the caveats, and converted the repeated pain into design choices. No scraped review-marketplace content and no invented testimonials.
SAP Ariba · Coupa · Email · Excel
Mid-market practitioners described long email chains, repeated document chasing, fragmented ownership, missing information, and a gap between spreadsheets and very large enterprise suites.
Our response: Use a no-login completeness gate, show every requirement up front, and route exceptions to one accountable owner.
See evidence and caveatSAP Ariba
Supplier-side operators reported unintuitive registration forms, interface failures, unresolved support loops, and repeated automated reminders after the buyer had abandoned the request.
Our response: Do not require supplier accounts; validate the interface with suppliers; stop reminders when an authorized owner pauses or abandons a request.
See evidence and caveatCoupa
A large Coupa operator described useful configurability and vendor ranking, alongside substantial administration and particular onboarding difficulty for small suppliers.
Our response: Compete on supplier effort and clear completeness, not on matching an enterprise suite feature for feature.
See evidence and caveatReciprocity, with something genuinely useful
Take the checklist, even if we never work together.
The defensible supplier scorecard template is a practical starting point for improving this workflow today.
Download free CSV- 01Document numerator, denominator, time window, and owner for every metric
- 02Keep missing data separate from poor performance
- 03Link each exception to an auditable source row
- 04Record supplier disputes without silently rewriting history
Design-partner offer
Supplier Scorecard Proof Run
€299 for one reporting cycle
Expected plan: from €149/month. Future pricing is a hypothesis, not a payment commitment.
- A customer-confirmed metric dictionary and weighting sheet
- Supplier-by-supplier exception narratives linked to source rows
- A QBR-ready pack that preserves missing-data and dispute flags
- Direct access to the small Venthry team
Plain-English risk reversalNo long contract. If the supplied metrics cannot be defined consistently, we return a gap report instead of inventing a score.
Small first commitment
See if the pilot fits.
Reserve a nonbinding fit review. No card, operational files, credentials, or customer data belong in this form. We reply personally with the next safe step.
Questions, answered plainly
No hidden implementation story.
Do suppliers see the scorecard?+
Only if your team chooses to share it. The pilot is prepared for the buyer.
Can you combine different ERP exports?+
The pilot supports one agreed tabular schema. Custom integrations wait until repeatability is proven.
Does AI decide if a supplier is good or bad?+
No. Your team confirms metrics and weights; the system assembles evidence and highlights exceptions.
Why not use our procurement suite?+
If your existing suite already produces a trusted, repeatable QBR, use it. This pilot is for teams still rebuilding the pack manually.